Analysis of the energy transition is dominated by energy modelling. Why is this? Well, first we’ve been analysing the energy sector for decades (since the oil shocks of the 1970s). Second, the topic lends itself well to quantification (e.g., physical flows of energy, technology characteristics, economic costs and benefits, environmental impacts, etc.) And third, energy is a truly interdisciplinary subject and models are a great short-hand way to combine different methods from different disciplines.
So – like them or loathe them – energy models are here to stay. Obviously, models exist alongside empirical analysis and qualitative research methods. But modellers are always trying to find ways to capture the insights from these other approaches.
Hence energy models provide the underpinning language to support decision makers across policy, industry, and civil society. If you see an energy related number (or much better a range of numbers) in a media outlet, a company strategy, or a policy document – it likely originated in a model.
We intentionally cast a wide net in our definition, and consider a “UK energy model” as having six key elements:
Energy models don’t only exist in academic ivory towers! Much of the UK’s modelling expertise is in consulting firms (both large and specialised), in national and devolved government, in public and regulatory bodies, and in-house in companies.
No matter which organisation you sit in, life as an energy modeller gives you two big problems:
In academia a debate has raged (Pfenninger, 2017), to make energy models transparent so they qualify as “true science” where others can understand your work, and can verify and replicate it (DeCarolis et al., 2017). The UK government has led a parallel effort to make all the models it uses to be transparent and quality assured via the guidance in the Aqua Book.
We recognise the practical difficulties of making models transparent and to maximise inclusivity have defined three levels:
We believe that transparency is key to ensure the implications (and limitations) of energy models are fully understood by decision makers.
So, this is why we are launching a ground-breaking survey of ALL the energy models in the UK (take the survey here). This is coordinated via UKERC’s Energy Modelling Hub, which is advised by a Steering Group of key stakeholders (UKRI, BEIS, Scottish Government, Northern Ireland Government, Committee on Climate Change, Energy Systems Catapult, and the National Infrastructure Commission).
The major findings will be initially communicated by putting interactive diagrams/tables on the UKERC website. Contributing modelling teams and our Steering Group will receive further in-depth analysis of the range of UK energy models.
A mid-term aim is that all policy orientated energy modelling would become more transparent, progressing to level 1 (open description), and onto level 2 (open access). And we will discuss with our Steering Group how transparency can be built into future funding calls and commissioned energy modelling projects.